Canon canoscan 8800F review by Stockholmviews.com, page 3 |
|||||
Compared to some other scanners |
|||||
This page contains comparison crops taken from scans performed with the Canon FS4000 film scanner and the Canon 8600 scanner. If you like to compare it to the 9950F just open the 8600F review in a new window
I rely don't care about the straight scan results because I think that the final result is the |
|||||
8800F |
8600F |
||||
FS4000 |
|||||
8800F |
8600F |
||||
FS4000 |
|||||
8800F |
8600F |
||||
FS4000 |
|||||
8800F |
8600F |
||||
FS4000 |
|||||
For the 8800F and 8600F the USM settings used = A:400 R:2,1 T:0
USM settings for FS 4000 was adjusted to suite the sharper raw scan from this film scanner. |
|||||
By looking at the samples above, the winner is the good old FS4000 as expected :0) |
|||||
But I can also spot a little improvement in the 8800F scan compared to the 8600F scan. |
|||||
Next page the Canon canoscan 8800F and Vuescan, will it improve the performance? |
|||||