Canon canoscan 8800F review by Stockholmviews.com, page 2
|
|||||
Film scanning (35mm film) |
|||||
All crop's below is at 4800dpi at 100% from the above 35mm Velvia 100F slide film. |
|||||
USM=unsharp mask sharpening A=amount R=radius T=threshold |
|||||
Crop 1 no USM applied, straight from scanner. |
Crop 1 USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0 |
||||
Crop 2
no USM applied,
straight from scanner. |
Crop 2 USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0 |
||||
Crop 3
no USM applied,
straight from scanner. |
Crop 3 USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0 |
||||
Crop 3 scanned at 2400dpi and interpolated to 4800dpi USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0 |
|||||
Crop 4
no USM applied,
straight from scanner. |
Crop 4 USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0 |
||||
Crop 4 scanned at 2400dpi and interpolated to 4800dpi USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0 |
|||||
USM was applied to the hole image before cropping out the samples (To be able to control the quality of sharpening). |
|||||
My intention are to let the images speak for them self. Maybe I will ad some comments later. |
|||||
I suggest the [ forum ] if you like to discuss or comment this review. | |||||
Next page will contain some comparisons with my other scanners. | |||||