|
|
Canon canoscan 8800F review by Stockholmviews.com , page 6
|
|
|
|
What's new in version Vuescan 8.4.48
- Fixed problem with Canon 8800F transparency scans
- Added CCD exposure time for Canon 8800F
- Improved multi-exposure on most Canon flatbed scanners
- Only do multi-exposure if scan will benefit
- Don't display full path names in status bar
- Fixed problem with B/W scans on HP G4010
- Fixed maximum scan size on Agfa StudioScan
|
Crop positions above. |
During the test of Vuescan and the Multi exposure feature of this excellent software
I will also explore if it is possible to improve scan quality by adding weight for stability!
I also fixed the film to the scanner glass with tape to make sure it don't move around due to
vibrations caused by the scanner during the scanning cycle.
|
|
3 ea sandbags and a total of 7kg on top of the scanner, will this improve the sharpness? |
|
USM applied to all scans, for the 8800F Amount=400 Radius=2,1 Threshold=0
FS4000 scan upsampled 4000px -> 4800px and USM Amount=200 Radius=0,3 Threshold=0
|
|
|
|
8800F Normal scan without sandbags / tape
and no multi-exposure |
8800F with sandbags but not
multi-exposure |
|
|
|
8800F with sandbags and
multi-exposure on |
And finally a crop from a scan performed with
the dedicated film scanner Canon FS4000 |
|
|
|
8800F Normal scan without sandbags / tape
and no multi-exposure |
8800F with sandbags but not
multi-exposure |
|
|
|
8800F with sandbags and
multi-exposure on |
And finally a crop from a scan performed with
the dedicated film scanner Canon FS4000 |
|
My conclution? |
Well, the multi-exposure feature of Vuescan is in fact usefull most notisable are that the noise
level in the shadows looks better when multi-exposure mode are activated, but the scan will also
take more time to perfom (Vuescan actually scan the image twice in multi-exposure mode)
|
|
|
I can't se any improvement when sandbags are used so no more sandbags for me :0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|