logo
Canon canoscan 8600F review by Stockholmviews.com, page 2
 
 
All crop's below is at 4800dpi at 100% from the above 35mm Velvia 100F slide film.
USM=unsharp mask sharpening   A=amount R=radius T=threshold
Scanned with Scangear 13.0.0 software with settings displayed at page 1
crop 1 no USMcrop 1 USM
Crop 1 no USM applied, straight from scanner.
Crop 1 USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0
 
crop 2 of the Canoscan 8600 review Crop 2 with USM applied for sharpening
Crop 2 no USM applied, straight from scanner.
Crop 2 USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0
 
crop 2 upscaled from 2400 dpi to 4800
Crop 2 scanned at 2400dpi and up scaled to 4800 (Bicubic smooth setting in PS)
USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0 (I think I can spot that the 4800 scan catch a bit more
detail than than the 2400 pix scan, the 4800 scan is also less grainy.
 
Canon 8600F review third crop positionCrop 3 USM added
Crop 3 no USM applied, straight from scanner.
Crop 3 USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0
 
 
Canon canoscan 8600F film capable scanner review Crop 4Crop 4 with USM applied
Crop 4 no USM applied, straight from scanner.
Crop 4 USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0
 
3400 dpi upsampled to 4800
Crop 4 scanned at 2400dpi and up scaled to 4800 (Bicubic smooth setting in PS)
USM applied A=400 R=2.1 T=0 (Again the 4800 scan catch a bit more
detail and seams sharper than than the 2400 pix scan, usm settings same as in 4800 scan.
  
  I suggest the [ forum ] if you like to discuss or comment this review.
 
  Next page will contain some comparisons with my other scanners.
  9950F FS4000 and the 8600F that are replaced by the 8800F.
 
 
Next >>
 
Gallery | D.I.Y | Reviews | Shop | Blog | Contact